Re: What is enough theory for amateur musicians?

jenkco@ou.edu
Tue, 10 Dec 1996 09:18:49 -0800

reed wrote:
>
> At 12:08 PM 12/9/96 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >Reed replied to Lawson and included the following advice:
> >
> >>3) Don't use guidetones.
> >
> >Before I reply completely, could you elaborate on your aversion to using
> >guide tones?
> >
> >
> Well I bascially don't think that knowing about or practicing
> guide tones leads to playing melodically or anything else useful.
>
> I think the only thing that leads to playing melodically is playing melodies.
>
> Therefore I think it's important to:
>
> 1) Learn tunes (new melodies).
>
> 2) Write melodies and solos
>
> 3) Transcribe melodies and solos.
>
> 4) Try and play melodies while improvising.
>
> Maybe you'll change my mind.

Hi! I don't usually post, but I'm willing to state my case on
guidetones. I don't think they are the most valuable tool at your
disposal, but I still think they should be given some some consideration.
Just speaking melodically, many jazz melodies consist almost entirely of
3rds and 7ths(All The Things You Are) or have 3rds and 7ths on the
downbeat(Autumn Leaves). Therefore, it is usually considered safe to
center improvisations around guidetones. The problem is when this is
used as the sole means of improvisation, and people leave their ear out
of the equation entirely. I had a friend who would just try to hit a 3
and a 7 in every measure because he had read about guidetones. This will
obviously fail. However, it is not necessarily a bad thing for beginners
to know, and use with some discretion.

Mark L. Jenkins
>
> reed
>
> >