As an example, in the ii-V-I progression, commonly played using the major
scale of the I, the 3rd of the ii chord might be chromatically embellished,
and given added importance by such; this same note would seldom receive the
same treatment as the progression moved to the I, because the 3rd of the ii
chord is not usually a great landing place on the I chord.
At 09:47 AM 12/12/96 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>They are playing melodies and melodies are essentially diatonic,
>>with of course added chromatic embelishment using approach notes
>>and other such techniques.
>>
>
>RE: playing in the diatonic key vs. guide tones
>
>Take any tune (like Misty or Cherokee) that progresses to the IV chord. In
>F the progression might be:
>
>F ///| ////| Cm7 ///| F7///| Bb ...
>
>What is the difference between the two keys? The pitch Eb. All the rest of
>the notes are the same, so for a melody to actually makes the change, you
>would have to include the Eb, probably in a significant spot in your line.
>What is the guide tone note for the Cm7 chord? The pitch Eb. Same results
>from two points of reference.
>
>We can all hear the difference in a beginning player who would continue to
>play E naturals through the Cm7 F7 measures. I may suggest the theory of
>guide-tones or target notes to get them to hear the difference that one
>note can make, or I may suggest the concept of modulating briefly to the
>key of IV, which requires the Eb.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________
>Bert Ligon
>Director of Jazz Studies
>_______________________________________
>School of Music
>University of South Carolina
>Columbia, SC 29208
>Voice: (803) 777-6565
>Fax: (803) 777-6508
>bligon@mozart.sc.edu
>_______________________________________
>
>
>
>
Tim Walters @j
walterstr@fau.campus.mci.net
school:
Department of Music home:
Florida Atlantic University 5193 Lake Blvd.
Boca Raton, FL 33431 Delray Beach, FL 33484
(561)367-3824 (561)496-0463